Shakespeares Schooling and Early Years

Shakespeare's Schooling and Early Years How was William Shakespeares school life? What school did he join in? Is it safe to say that he was top of the class? Lamentably, there is almost no proof remaining, so antiquarians have arranged various sources to give a feeling of what his school life would have been similar to. Shakespeare's School Life Fast Facts William Shakespeare went to King Edward VI Grammar School in Stratford-upon-AvonHe began there when he was seven.Little is thought about his young life at the school, however it is conceivable to discover what life would have been similar to for him by seeing what school life resembled back then. Language School Language schools were everywhere throughout the nation around then and were gone to by young men of comparable foundations to Shakespeare’s. There was a national educational plan set out by the government. Young ladies were not allowed to go to class, so we will never know the capability of Shakespeare’s sister Anne, for instance. She would have remained at home and helped Mary, his mom, with the family unit errands. It is accepted that William Shakespeare would have most likely gone to class with his more youthful sibling Gilbert, who was two years his lesser. In any case, his more youthful sibling Richard would have passed up a sentence structure school instruction in light of the fact that the Shakespeares were encountering budgetary issues at that point and they couldn't stand to send him. So the instructive and future achievements of Shakespeare relied upon his folks bearing to send him to get training. Numerous others were not all that blessed. Shakespeare himself passed up full instruction as we will later find. Shakespeare’s school is as yet a sentence structure school today, and is gone to by young men who have breezed through their 11 tests. They acknowledge the extremely top level of young men who have done well in their tests. The School Day The school day was long and repetitive. Youngsters went to class from Monday until Saturday from 6 or 7 oclock toward the beginning of the day until 5 or 6 oclock around evening time with a two hour break for supper. On his day away from work, Shakespeare would have been required to go to chapel. It being a Sunday, there was next to no available time, as the faith gathering would continue for quite a long time at once! Occasions just occurred on strict days, yet these would not surpass one day. Educational program Physical Education was not on the educational program by any stretch of the imagination. Shakespeare would have been relied upon to learn long sections of Latin exposition and verse. Latin was the language utilized in most regarded callings including the law, medication and in the ministry. Latin was, along these lines, the pillar of the educational program. Understudies would have been versed in language, talk, rationale, stargazing, and number-crunching. Music was likewise part of the educational plan. Understudies would have been routinely tried and physical disciplines would have been offered out to the individuals who didn't progress admirably. Money related Troubles John Shakespeare was having money related issues when Shakespeare was a young person and Shakespeare and his sibling had to leave school as their dad could no longer compensation for it. Shakespeare was 14 at that point. The Spark for a Career Toward the finish of the term, the school would give old style performances in which the young men would perform. It is totally conceivable this is the place Shakespeare sharpened his acting aptitudes and information on plays and old style stories. A considerable lot of his plays and sonnets depend on old style messages, including Troilus and Cressida and The Rape of Lucrece. In Elizabethan occasions, youngsters were viewed as smaller than normal grown-ups, and were prepared to assume on an adult’s position and occupation. Young ladies would have been given something to do at home repairing garments, cleaning and cooking, young men would have been acquainted with their father’s calling or functioned as homestead hands. Shakespeare may have been utilized as such by the Hathaway’s, this may have been the means by which he met Anne Hathaway. We forget about him after he leaves school at 14, and the before we know it is that he is hitched to Anne Hathaway. Youngsters were offered early. This is reflected in Romeo and Juliet. Juliet is 14 and Romeo is a comparable age.

Case Study of Thermal Comfort in House free essay sample

Arrangements, issues and issue distinguishing pieces of proof for every individual rooms has been the point of this report. Other than that, this report likewise furnishes system and technique managing the warm solace in each room. 1. 1 Introduction Modern man go through the vast majority of their days indoor, in this manner, warm solace is a significant part of the structure configuration process. Fulfillment with the warm condition is communicated through the perspective which characterizes warm solace. Broad normalization and demonstrating exists for warm solace, which depends both on physiological and physical parameters. The warmth trade between nature and the human body, can be portrayed as the attribute of the earth. Theres no standard for warm solace, it includes such a large number of viewpoint including brain research, physiology, building sciences and numerous logical fields which makes this issue much increasingly perplexing. Page 2 Table of Content 1. Conceptual 1. 1 Introduction 2. 0 Basic standards and prerequisites of Thermal Comfort 2. 1 Environmental Factors 2. 1. 1 Air Temperature 2. 1. 2 Radiant Temperature 2. We will compose a custom exposition test on Contextual analysis of Thermal Comfort in House or then again any comparable point explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page 1. 3 Air Velocity 2. 1. 4 Humidity 2. Individual Factor 2. 2. 1 Clothing protection 2. 2. 2 Metabolic Heat 3. 0 Background of chosen building 3. 1 Floor plans and spaces 3. 2 Macroclimate 4. 0 Justification of contextual investigation 4. 1 Issues and proposals 4. 1. 1 Living lobby 4. 1. 2 Room 1 4. 1. 3 Stairway 4. 1. 4 Room 3 5 4. 1. 5 Room 6 4. 1. 6 Overall Building 5. 0 Conclusion 6. 0 References 21 22 9 7 6 4 5 2 Page 3 2. 0 Basic Principles and necessities of Thermal Comfort Thermal Comfort According to P. O Fanger, warm solace of a structure is influenced by six sorts of parameters. Plus, these six parameters of warm solace can be isolated into two distinctive sort of components and they are the individual and condition variables and they are as underneath: Environmental factor 1. Dampness 2. Air Velocity 3. Brilliant Temperature 4. Air Temperature Personal Factor 1. Metabolic warmth 2. Apparel Insulation picture demonstrating the six components of warm solace Page 4 2. 1 Environmental elements: 2. 1. 1. Air temperature our body are encircled via air temperature and they are generally measure in (Â °F). Fahrenheit or (Â °C) Degrees. 2. 1. Brilliant temperature Heat that emanates from warm article is called as warm brilliant. At the point when theres ehat sources around the earth, brilliant warmth will be available. On how we lose and gain heat through the earth, brilliant temperature has a more noteworthy impact contrasted with the air temperature. By wearing intelligent attire, our skin ingests less warmth however without it, our skin retains heat as much as a matt dark article. Here are a couple of instances of brilliant warmth sources and they are liquid metals, hardware, sweltering surfaces, dryers, cookers, dividers in furnaces, stoves, steam rollers, urnaces, electric terminated, fire, sun and that's only the tip of the iceberg. 2. 1. 3 Air speed If air speed is cooler than the earth, the speed of air moving across specialist may chill them off. Individuals are generally touchy to air speed in this way its increasingly significant factor in warm solace. Individuals feel stodgy in a stale or stilled air indoor conditions. Especiall when they are falsely warmed up. 2. 1. 4. Mugginess Humidity is given when water is warmed and dissipated into the air coming about muggy and wet in air. 70% to 40% of relative dampness wouldnt cause sway on warm solace Page 5 . 2 Personal elements: 2. 2. 1. Garments protection By its very nature, garments can meddle with our capacity to lose warmth to the environmental factors. On wearer, warm solace is to a great extent subject to the protecting impact of apparel. In any event, when the earth is in immaculate condition, not hot or chilly, wearing a lot of individual defensive gear (PPE) or wearing an excessive amount of dress possibly be a significant reason for heat pressure. Cold wounds, for example, hypothermia and ice nibble might be caused on the wearer in the event that he/she didnt not wear enough garments with protection in chilly conditions. . 2. 2. Work rate/metabolic warmth For warm hazard evaluation, metabolic or work rate is fundamental. As we complete physical exercises, we produce heat from the internal of our bodies. The more warmth we produce when the more physical work we do. The most warmth will be lost when the more warmth we produce. This is to keep body from overheating. On warm solace, the effect of metabolic rate is basic. In particular, It is fundamental to consider the people own physical attributes while thinking about these variables. Page 6 3. 0 Backgr ound of chosen building The chose working in this report is situated at Townhouse 2, 279 Sandgate Road, Shortland, New South Wales 2307. Its the main house behind townhouse 1, it cant truly be seen from Sandgate street. This house is a twofold story working with around of 400 square meters of inside spaces. Townhouse 2 , 279, Sandgate Road 3. 1 Floor Plans and spaces The ground floor comprises of two rooms, a living corridor, kitchen, feasting zone, utility zone and a little restroom, while the principal floor comprises of only four rooms with singular washrooms. Page 7 Ground Floor Plan First Floor Plan For this situation study, the two levels are being broke down as far as warm solace. 3. 2 Macroclimate During mid years, the climate of New South Wales beach front region is marginally damp and calm and common is somewhat moist and mild and normal liberated from extraordinary cold or hot. The chose contextual investigation is situated at Shortland Sandgate street, directly close to the University of Newcastle. the following is the picture of significant atmosphere for University of Newcastle. picture indicating atmosphere of UON. www. bom. gov. au/atmosphere/normal Page 8 4. Defense of contextual analysis For this situation study, encounters and avocation of human are utilized to dissect things around the room/working with no information assortment. 4. 1 Issues and proposals For this situation study, both story will be dissected by various feels and perception of the creator. Issues of the space will be noted out and proposals will be given to addit ionally improve warm solace in the house. 4. 1. 1 Living Hall Plan showing living lobby area in the house. Perception and examination dependent on tangible of the analyser: The living lobby and kitchen is at the north side of the structure. Be that as it may, the structure is cold lasting through the year. This is most likely on the grounds that the North introduction to daylight isn't sufficient. The kitchen has blocked portion of the north introduction and there are a great deal of trees outside the house that obstructed the immediate daylight into the house. The house is in dim more often than not of the day. Page 9 Issues and proposals of the zone. Hard floor completes Floor on the living lobby to be earthenware tiles since when these tiles which lay on the solid piece will expand the warm mass and has capacity to store heat in it. during summer, this can improve the cooling of the house, gave all windows are to be concealed. t works the best for places with great north daylight get to, thusly, this spot needs more openings toward the north also. Boost Window opportunity. By boosting windows towards the north territory, more daylight can be coordinated into the house. Obviously, with sun shades and blinds on the win dow also to forestall overexposure to the daylight. Migrating the trees outside the house. Trees outside the house can be migrated to behind the kitchen to abstain from blocking direct daylight into the living territory. Picture showing migration of plants outside living and kitchen zone Page 10 4. 1. Room 1 Plan demonstrating area of Room 1 Observation and examination dependent on tactile of the analyser: Room one fundamental window is looking toward the West and solid evening summer daylight is shone legitimately into the clients room, this makes the room sweltering during late spring. Picture of room 1 from outside Page 11 Issues and suggestions of the region. Picture indicating how piece can control daylight passage during various season. A piece is prescribed to be introduced above room ones window to cut off summer daylight. by along these lines, sun won't be coordinated into the room and it can remain cool during summer . The piece length ought to be obliging to permit winter daylight to sparkle into the structure and warmth up the room. 4. 1. 3 Stairway Plan demonstrating the area of flight of stairs Page 12 Stairway in the house Observation and investigation dependent on tactile of the analyser: The flight of stairs/focal of the house is dull and feels blocked as there are no ventilations around this zone. It feels awkward and it amkes individuals wheeze strolling up the steps. Issues and proposals of the region. picture indicating the fumes framework suggested http://www. 123rf. com/photo_10021797_ventilation-framework It is prescribed to introduce a ventilation framework on the flight of stairs. in the focal zone of the house, which is the flights of stairs interfacing ground floor to the main floor, committed fumes ventilation fan associated with outside air conduit is introduced on the zone. This fumes fan is worked physically in spite of the fact that it very well may be associated with cooling framework activity, warming activity, humidistat or a clock. The great side about this framework is that humidistat or clock can be utilized to permit ventilations at a particular time, or when the house is excessively moist inside or when one of the contaminations in house is high. This devoted fumes fan is littler than run of the mill heater blower, It gives most extreme control to tenants too. Page 13 4. 1. 4 Room 6. Plan showing the area of room 6 View of room 6 from outside Observation and investigation dependent on tangible of the analyser: Rooms 6 is the coldest among all rooms during winter, It is the extra room included hardly any months back, and it should be an upper living corridor. The floor is comprised of tiles and the inward dividers are timber with

Blog Archive mbaMissions Exclusive Interview with Yale School of Managements Admissions Director Bruce DelMonico

Blog Archive mbaMission’s Exclusive Interview with Yale School of Management’s Admissions Director Bruce DelMonico Bruce DelMonico, Yale School of Management’s Admissions Director The Yale School of Management’s (SOM’s) long-standing admissions director, Bruce DelMonico, recently took some time to chat with us about the MBA program’s current admissions process and provide insight into a few issues that are no doubt of interest to Yale SOM applicants. The following are just a few of the key topics DelMonico addressed: The steady increase in the school’s application numbers in recent years The admissions committee’s consensus approach to admit decisions How a candidate can avoid sounding inauthentic in the application The number one thing applicants should do when they find themselves on the waitlist His thoughts on the ubiquitous GMAT versus GRE question The inspiration behind Yale SOM’s video question Read on for the full interview. mbaMission: First, let me start by thanking you for talking with me today. We appreciate it. Some have been saying that the Yale School of Management [SOM] is losing its reputation of being quirky and untraditional and instead becoming more Wall Street, more corporate. Would you agree with this, and if so, does it change the kind of student you’re trying to attract? Bruce DelMonico: I’ve heard that over the past year or twoâ€"concerns about the culture changing or losing the school’s characterâ€"but actually, I don’t agree with that assessment. From the admissions perspective, first of all, it hasn’t changed anything in terms of what we’re doing or who we’re hoping to attract. I haven’t seen changes in terms of the composition of the incoming students. I think if anything, in terms of that first job after graduation, the shift may be a little bit more toward consulting. I think that’s probably consistent with what other schools are seeing. I don’t think that’s a sign of anything large or any major deviation from our culture or mission, or from the character of the school. I think that remains intact. mbaMission: Great. The school has seen a pretty steady increase in application numbers over the past couple years. What do you believe is driving this increase, and what effect has it had, if any, on how you evaluate candidates? And what’s been the effect on selectivity? BD: That’s a good question. I think you could even go back farther and say that over the past decade, there’s been an increase. I’ve been at the school for 11 years now, and when I started, we received somewhere around 2,000 applications. Now we receive somewhere around 3,500. So, in my time, there’s been about a 70% increase in the number of applications we receive, which is a big jump. And I think there are a number of things behind this. I’d like to think that some of things we do in admissions have helped, but there have also been changes on a larger scaleâ€"the introduction of the integrated curriculum, Dean [Ted] Snyder’s arrivalâ€"a lot of momentum that’s been happening, so really sharpening our focus, deepening our integration with the university, expanding our global presence and our global aspirations, really working to continue to refine our integrated curriculum, and then things like Evans Hall, our new campus, have helped us or garnered attention. I think a ll those things have contributed to the growth of our applicant pool. As for the selectivity, we’ve been roughly in the same range over the past few years, because as we’ve grown the pool, we’ve also grown the class size. We used to be in the low 200s in terms of the class, and now, we’re in the low 300s. So the class has grown to a large degree in parallel with the applicant pool, and I think that’s held the selectivity consistent. In terms of the evaluation process, we obviously have more files to go through. But we of course want to maintain the quality of the process and not cut corners. We have more people reviewing, so that’s helped, but some of it is just simply working a little harder. We definitely evaluate more files in a week than we had previously, but we don’t want to devote any less time to them. We actually have a consensus-based process, which means we all sit down as a committee and have to be in agreement on the outcome of the files, of the applicants. Naturally, that has taken more time as the pool has grown, but we’ve been able to manage it. I’m a believer in that consensus model, so that’s something we’ll stay with. mbaMission: That does seem like it might slow the process down a bit, having a whole group  making the final decisions, rather than just one or two people. BD: It does, but my belief is that it yields a richer outcome, and we make sure that we’re balancing, so that everybody brings a different perspective. I think that’s an important part of the process. mbaMission: Sure. With the increase in applications, do you feel you’ve also seen an increase in quality, for a lack of better word, in the applicants you’re getting, or are you just getting a greater number of the same-level candidates? BD: My sense is that it’s more the latter than the former. We’ve always received really, really strong, high-quality applications, and we continue to. So I don’t know that qualitatively, there’s been at the top end a huge increase in the quality of the pool. What we’ve seen is that there have been more of those high-quality applicants, if that makes sense. I don’t think the quality of the top end has gotten any stronger, but the depth maybe has gotten a little bit deeper. I think that’s obviously a good thing for us. mbaMission: Got it. You regularly offer applicants the advice of being themselves in their application, rather than trying to be whatever they think you or the admissions committee wants them to be. How do you know when someone is not being genuine in their application? Are there certain tells? BD: Maybe there are people who are so good at it we can’t tell! But we do tell people to be themselves, and I know other schools do as well, and we do it for a good reason. We want to get a sense of who you really are. I’ve used this analogy in the past, and hopefully, it’s a helpful one, but my professional background is that I’m a lawyer, so I was a litigator. And when you’re preparing someone for a deposition or for trial, the first thing you tell them is to tell the truth. And there are two reasons you do that: one is that it’s right thing to do, and then the second is that it’s much easier to remember the truth. And I think that applies in the application process as well. What we’re looking for as we’re evaluating candidates is to make sure that everything kind of fits together, which isn’t to say that it has to be entirely consistent across every element of the application, that it’s all uniform. But when you say one thing in your essay about what you’ve done and what you’re interested in doing, and then your recommenders say something completely different, and your academic record and professional background show something else, those are the things we see as potential tells that you’re trying to present yourself as someone other than who you are. So that will raise a red flag for us. By telling the truth and being yourself, you’re not presenting multiple selves to different schools, and you don’t have to keep track of “What did I say to this school?” and “What did I say to that school?” I think there’s a sense that some schools are finance schools or marketing schools or nonprofit schools or operations schools, and therefore you need to be a finance person or a marketing person or a nonprofit person or an operations person to each of these schools. I don’t know if that ever was the case in the past, but I know that certainly at Yale and every other school, the admissions offices are looking to put together a very diverse class, so you don’t have fit any one particular model or mold. mbaMission: Right. BD: But when you start to sort of shape your candidacy to fit the schoolâ€"I mean obviously, you might highlight certain aspects of yourself to different schools, based on what you think might resonate more with themâ€"but if you go too far in that direction, you start to seem insincere or not terribly genuine, and that’s where the red flags come in. So, if you have always been in finance and now you want to go into nonprofit, well, did you ever volunteer? Did you ever do anything in the nonprofit space? Where is that interest coming from? Or if you have always been in the nonprofit space and want to go into finance, where is that interest coming from? What’s behind that? If we see a disconnect there, that’s where we question that aspect of the candidacy. But even when we see that, that doesn’t automatically mean we’re not going to admit that person. Sometimes we’ll see a candidate who says, “I have these goals,” but we’ll look at their profile and get the sense that they’re saying that because they think that’s what they need to say. We might still admit them, and they might think they got admitted because they said that, but actually, they got admitted despite having said it. We recognize that they’re maybe being a little cute with the application, but we still find their application compelling, and we’re willing to overlook that. mbaMission: Okay. So what would you say to someone who thinks, “I can’t just be who I am in my application because I’m too boring,” or, “I don’t have anything impressive to say, so they won’t notice me”? What advice would you give someone like that? BD: That’s a good question. I have to say that if your goal is to stick out and be unique, no one else will have the same experiences you have, and even if you say, “I’m boring” or “My career path has been too straightforward,” the way to stand out is to discuss what you did there, how you distinguished yourself. We’re looking for people who have a range of different backgrounds, but the thing that really makes them stand out is that they really sell what they’ve done. So if you maybe have what you think is a traditional MBA background, and you don’t stick out in terms of where you’ve been, the way to stick out is by focusing on what you’ve done. That’s really what will get our attention. mbaMission: Sure. If you were to speak to someone who had just decided to go for their MBA and hadn’t done any research at all on any of the top schools, but you could tell them only one thing about Yale, what would be your selling point? BD: No pressure! Okay, I won’t be evasive and say, “Well, I couldn’t pick just one.” If I really could give only one thing, I would say that we’re a school where the mission matters. Our mission is to educate leaders for business and society, and we really care about that mission. We care about living up to that mission. It’s very broad, it’s very multisector, and it’s the founding mission. It’s been the same since the school was founded back in 1970s. It very much still guides what we do at the school. So, that is the one thing I would tell someone who is just coming to the process and just learning about SOM. mbaMission: Nicely done! What guidance can you give someone who finds him- or herself on the waitlist? And why might someone end up on the waitlist in the first place? BD: People can end up on the waitlist for a number of different reasons. We might really like their candidacy, but there might be one thing we have a question about or one thing we feel they need to strengthen. It could be something very specific, or it could just be that it’s a very competitive applicant pool, and they’re strong, but we want to have a better sense of how the pool and the class are going to shape up before we make a final decision. They might be on the waitlist really just because of the competitiveness of the pool. We do also sometimes waitlist people without interviewing them, and I think that sometimes freaks people out, so just to let people know, that’s not the norm, but it’s not so uncommon that you should be concerned. If you didn’t get an interview but then find yourself on the waitlist, sometimes that can be a sign that there might be one thing that we have a question about or something we want to get a little more clarity on. The advice I would give, I think the main thing is that if you find yourself on the waitlist, when you get the decision, we will give you a list of FAQs that tells you, here are some next steps, here’s what you can do, and the first thing we say is to reach out and ask for feedback. We have an email address you can use to request feedback, and it surprises me the number of people I speak to on the waitlist, when I ask whether they asked for feedback, they say no. In my mind, that should be the first thing you do. We’ll tell you why you’re on the waitlist. We’ll tell you what we think you can do to improve your candidacy, to strengthen yourself and strengthen your chances of getting in. But there are people who don’t take advantage of that opportunity. So, the first thing is definitely ask us why you’re on the waitlist. It might be that it’s a very competitive year, and that’s all we can say, or there might be something very specific we can tell you that will help. The other thing is to continue to be in touch, but obviously, in appropriate ways and at appropriate times. If you have a major update, let us know. If you want to just check in every so often, that’s fine, too. But there are some people who are in touch several times a week. I would not suggest that; that’s what can distinguish you in a not-so-positive way. But every two weeks or once a month, if you want to check in and see how things are going and just reiterate your interest, that is always helpful to us. It’s always good for us to know that you remain interested, you want to continue to be considered, and that could be a helpful thing just by itself. mbaMission: Sure. Is there an end date for the Yale waitlist, or do you keep accepting candidates more or less up until the last minute? BD: It depends on the year. We can accept people sometimes up to the very last minute. We try to give people some sense of what the time frame is, but it depends on how things evolve on our end. We try not to keep a huge waitlist going into the summer, for example, just because it’s not fair to people to leave them in limbo for that long. So we try to have a somewhat more targeted waitlist. And every so often, at various points, we’ll reach out to see if you are still interested, so we know that if we get to the point where we’re thinking about making additional offers, we have a current list of people who are still interested and people who aren’t anymore. mbaMission: That makes sense. As you know best, Yale has accepted the GRE in addition to the GMAT for quite a while now. How would you compare the two exams from an admissions perspective, and if you were to recommend that an applicant take only one or the other, which one would you suggest? BD: Right, we have accepted the GRE for a number of years, and I think at this point, roughly 20% of students in our incoming class took the GRE as opposed to the GMAT, which I think is probably on the higher end among schools. We have no preference for one or the other; we value them equally. I think it would be a little perverse for us to accept both but then weight one more heavily than the other. We wouldn’t want to disadvantage anybody either way. In terms of recommending taking one or the other, I really think it’s a matter of personal preference, which one you feel more comfortable with. We look at them the same, and we incorporate them into the process the same way. There’s actually a concordance tool that ETS offers to help us better understand how the scores align. It’s a little bit broad, but it’s narrowed since the first inception, so it gives us a decent sense of what the corresponding score might be. We also have now a number of years of students who have come through and taken the GRE, so we’ve done our own regressions and analyses and have a better sense of how to view the tests. So, I think from the applicant perspective, it’s really just which one you feel more comfortable with. A lot of our applicants who have taken the GRE are interested in perhaps a joint degree with another schoolâ€"so forestry and environmental sciences, for example, or public healthâ€"and they want to take just one test as opposed to two, and that’s fine. Or maybe they’re thinking about other graduate schools, not just business school, maybe something like public policy school, and the GRE has more flexibility in that regard. But it’s really a mat ter of personal preference. mbaMission: Okay. What was your primary motivation for adding the video component to the Yale application, and what information or insight do you feel you get from the video question that you don’t get from the other parts of the application? BD: We actually first piloted the video component in I think 2011, so it’s been several years since we first started playing around with it. And it came about from a conversation we had internally. I was talking to a colleague who has now moved on, and we were talking about how admissions offices really hadn’t incorporated technology in what we thought was a very beneficial way, things like video essays or having applicants upload some sort of multimedia presentation. We didn’t feel as though that was really taking advantage of the technology as much as it could, and it wasn’t really leveraging the benefits of the technology. At the same time, we felt  that some of the formats might advantage people with more resources. They would be able to put together more impressive packages or have more advanced technology available to them. So we were thinking about what kind of technology we could use that would level the playing field but also give us really good insights that we wou ldn’t be getting in other contexts. That’s where the video questions came about. Again, I think we piloted it in 2011. We played around with different vendors and different formats to get to where we are now, and I think it will continue to evolve. In terms of what we’re hoping to get out of it, at the basic level, we want to get a sense of someone’s speaking ability, especially their English ability if they’re a nonnative speaker. Actually, in tandem with incorporating the video questions, we eliminated the TOEFL and the IELTS requirements, so no English language test, because we felt we could evaluate that directly ourselves. Beyond that, we wanted to get a sense of how well someone can think in the moment, so that extemporaneous speaking ability, which is a little bit beyond basic English ability and can show how well you think on your feet, because that is a skill that is tested and needed in business school and beyond. We do focus some of the video questions on certain different competencies that we think are important. We’re still working on building that part in terms of really structuring the questions and coding the responses in a way that we feel is helpful to us. That’s where I think a lot of the evolution will be. But we do feel that the video question provides a perspective on the applicant that we can’t get just from the paper application. It provides a new dimension, a new aspect to the candidacy, and I can say that we tend to view it almost invariably as a positive. It’s very rare for the questions to be a negative in someone’s application. More often it’s the case that it will allow us to see something new and maybe be even more interested in the candidate than we were before, so I think it’s overall positive for the applicants. mbaMission: I’m sure that will be very reassuring to any candidates who may be worried about the video component. BD: I think that’s the thing that when I talk to people, they’re the most nervous and the most apprehensive about, and the advice I tend to give people is, first of all, we don’t expect perfectionâ€"nobody does it perfectlyâ€"and second, you invariably did better than you thought you did. I think people are just really nervous about it. mbaMission: Absolutely. Do you recommend that candidates apply in any specific round? Is one better than the other? BD: We really don’t. We model to admit the same quality of students in each round, so it’s not as though there’s an advantage to applying in one round versus another. We have three rounds, and we’re also part of the Consortium for Graduate Study in Management, so we do receive applications that come in through the consortium and that are referred to us. But in terms of our three direct application rounds, like a lot of schools, we counsel people that if they can avoid the third round, they should try to do that. That’s not because it’s inherently any more difficult, but just because it’s more variable. It depends on how many people have already been accepted into the class in the first two rounds, so you just don’t know. It could be more than we were expecting, or it could be less. It’s that uncertainty that can make it more challenging. The main piece of advice we give everybody is to apply when you have your strongest application ready. Don’t rush to get it in e arlier if it’s going to be less strong. And especially between rounds one and two, as I said, we model so that the quality of people we’re admitting stays constant throughout, so there’s no advantage in applying in one round versus another. mbaMission: That’s helpful. What can reapplicants do to improve their chances the second time around? Those people who don’t get into Yale this year, what advice would you give them about trying again next year or the year after? BD: This is similar to what we tell people in terms of the waitlist. People are not successful for different reasons, so it’s not just one thing that each person can do; it’s really specific to an individual. And again, like with the waitlist, we’ll give feedback to applicants who are not successful. We do it over the summer, after the admissions season has wound down, in June, typically. We will provide feedback to anybody who was denied admission, and that’s really where you can get a sense of what you need to do to strengthen your candidacy, whether we felt you needed a little more professional experience, or we needed better evidence of your quantitative abilities, or any number of other things. We can give you that feedback, and that can help guide you as you think about strengthening your application for that reapplication. One other thing is that we run the numbers every year, and the admission rate for reapplicants is actually the same as for first-time applicants, so it’s definitely not the case that we have any sort of bias or prejudice against reapplicants. We definitely encourage them, and we definitely do admit people who have reapplied. mbaMission: That’s great. When you say you give feedback, what’s the format? Over the phone?   BD:  We’ve tried different formats, and right now, we do it by email. We find that’s the most helpful way to do it. mbaMission: Okay, thanks. Can you share any stories of outstanding applications or interview performance from the past couple years? What is something a candidate did or said that really stood out to you? BD: That’s such a tough one for a few reasons. One, candidacies are so different, there’s no template for itâ€"you know, this person did this, so if you do that same thing, you’ll be successful. And I feel as though with things like interviews, for example, a lot is based on the relationship, the give-and-take between the interviewer and the interviewee, and that can vary from person to person, which I think makes the interview especially challenging. I can’t think of any particular things or stories that stood out. One thing, and again it comes back to sincerity, is people acknowledging weaknesses but then explaining them and what they’ve learned from them and what they’re hoping to improve on. If you’ve done that well, it definitely stands out. I find that, if done well, it can be incredibly compelling. So it’s not just constantly touting your successes and how great you are, but stepping back, having a little bit of perspective, a little bit of self-awareness and i ncorporating that into your reason for wanting to get an MBA or using it to show your growth and development. I find that I’m often drawn to and rooting for those candidates who show that kind of self-awareness, that sense of humility, that desire to grow at business school and beyond. mbaMission: That makes sense. What is a part of the application process that you would like to see applicants spend a little more time on or maybe take a little more seriously? BD: That’s another tough question, because every application is so different, and the weak points tend to differ for each person. Obviously, we’re looking for lots of different qualities, and we’re looking for lots of different competences as we evaluate candidates for the program. And this is an across-the-board kind of thing, but one thing we do look at is quantitative ability. All business schools have some quantitative component in the course work, and obviously, we’re ultimately looking to admit people with long-term professional success, but we also want to make sure they’re able to keep up and do well in the more immediate term, during their two years in the program. And one thing we see sometimes is applicants who maybe haven’t demonstrated that quantitative proficiency through their course work, their testing, or their work experience, or some combination of the three. We look at all those three together. And I think where people don’t take advantage of the opportunity to strengthen their profile is by either not acknowledging that they might not have that exposure or as much exposure as they could, or by acknowledging it but not doing something about itâ€"telling us, for example, “If I’m admitted, I will take statistics and microeconomics.” What we would like to see is you acknowledge it and then actually be proactive in taking those courses to show you have the ability and the preparation to be able to keep up. That’s just one of a number of different things I could point to, but that’s one I think we see probably more often than some others. mbaMission: Got it. Thank you again for bringing us up to speed on the Yale program and admissions process. BD: No problem! Happy to talk. Share ThisTweet Admissions Officer Interviews Business School Yale University (School of Management)